Last year England finished second in Martin Johnson’s first Six Nations, well in keeping with their habit of finishing more strongly than they seem capable of, but widely considered a travesty. Since then the England manager has been continually criticised for his selection policy, the lack of fluency in England’s attack and his inability to communicate with the media, much of which is justified.
Johnson’s inexperience has certainly contrived to give the impression of a bunker mentality; a mix of ‘don’t you know there’s a war on?’ and ‘we’ll come right in the end,’ but he has been up against a media, which if not quite on a witch-hunt, has certainly been extreme in its views. It is surprising then, to see Eddie Butler soberly concluding on the general hysteria at the end of this Six Nations. I look forward to Stuart Barnes’ confession that England missed Steve Borthwick at the lineout in Paris, but I’m not holding my breath.
There is little denying that England have been unimpressive this season. They managed just five turnovers and six tries, in contrast to the sixteen racked up last year. Facing Scotland and France (both rejuvenated this year) away has presented a considerable challenge, and yet both should have been despatched.
One of the most severe criticisms levelled at Johnson is that his selection policy favours defensive players and more sinisterly, the old-guard who were playing in 2003. Actually, Johnson has been dealt a cruel hand by the injuries to Tom Croft and Tom Rees, while James Haskell has been off the boil since his two tries against Wales a month ago. Lewis Moody and Joe Worsely are conservative choices, notable for their tackling rather than their scavenging on the floor, so it is something of a mystery why Steffon Armitage hasn’t been given an opportunity at 7, especially when Nick Easter could make way for Worsely or Haskell.
In the front row, perhaps the most vulnerable position for the inexperienced player, Dylan Hartley and Dan Cole are slightly more mobile props who let England down in France but have otherwise been relatively solid. Hartley in particular looks like a prospect but is still young and hotheaded. In contrast to the back row, injuries have prevented Johnson from falling back on the old guard in the front row.
Outside of the backs, it is the second row that has met with most criticism. Steve Borthwick’s has been hounded throughout his captaincy, probably as much as a result of his lack of passion in post match interviews as his lack of ground made in the loose. The fact that England’s set-piece has at least been relatively solid is a small mercy, however, and it is more that the absence of Simon Shaw has exposed the lack of impact Louis Deacon makes. Again, a good case can be made for Courtney Lawes but Tom Palmer also seemed to serve the pack well against France.
Then there’s Jonny. Wilkinson bore the cost of a stultified backs division by being dropped for only the third time in his England career but England still have no strategy for their number 10 spot. Arguably, Toby Flood and Shane Geraghty battle it out as Danny Cipriani heads Down Under. Flood has enough in defence to please Johnson and while he doesn’t have Geraghty’s pace or inside ball, he knows where an overlap is possible and takes some wrestling to get thrown to the floor. In contrast, Wilkinson’s reputation for taking contact is hiding his unwillingness to run with the ball and when he came on against France he tended to kick possession away.
The niggling doubt that Flood or Geraghty will be found out plagues the England management, as does the thought of playing a World Cup in eighteen months without a team that is used to each other. Danny Care has been given an extended run at scrum half after Paul Hodgson and Harry Ellis had similar opportunities and has certainly not disgraced himself. Ben Foden has eventually been rewarded for his performances from the bench and Delon Armitage given some competition.
One player who has had an ineffective tournament, however, is Riki Flutey. Mike Tindall will take the plaudits for his performance yesterday, and Johnson will be criticised for the strange decision to remove him from play, but it was his man inside, who has so rarely been attacking the gain line as he is supposed to, and who disappeared for large chunks of yesterday that will cause headaches. Will he be back to form for next years Championship? The autumn tour of the Southern Hemisphere is a good place to test him out, but it must be a make or break moment.
Whether Johnson will keep the faith with Matthew Tait, who plays with heart and guile but has little of the power that Tindall, Dan Hipkiss or even Flutey offer is another tough call. Being thrown on yesterday did nothing for him but there remains the chance that he could produce a slashing break out of nothing like he did in the 2007 World Cup Final.
Johnno’s England have been more varied than they have been given credit for, but the time Johnson takes to make decisions is worrying. Personalising the problems has not helped, as it is fair to say that almost all players in the squad offer something. The trouble is that changes in personnel could well be the difference England need to get on the front foot. The forwards need to be rumbling forward or looking for turnovers and we have not yet caught up with the general view of the other five Nations that kicking possession away is not always the best policy. Wilkinson can still rise to a challenge but England’s safety-first approach is in danger of becoming inflexibility. I’m no fan of reckless running rugby (fact is, both Ireland and Wales suffered as a result of it at times). All I am saying, is give Flood a chance.

